Skip to the content

Blog

Family Law Act 1975 (the Act) places emphasis on ‘existing legal and equitable rights and interests” in property.

On 23 July 2025, the Full Court of the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia delivered the ruling in Shinohara & Shinohara [2025] FedCFamC1A 126, bringing an end to the longstanding practice of “addbacks”.

Read More

Family home

2 September 2025

By: Stephanie Reid

On 10 June 2025, Australia’s family law framework for property settlements underwent transformation with the implementation of the Family Law Amendment Act with section 79 of the Family Law Act 1975 (the Act), placing emphasis on ‘existing legal and equitable rights and interests” in property.

On 23 July 2025, the Full Court of the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia delivered the ruling in Shinohara & Shinohara [2025] FedCFamC1A 126, bringing an end to the longstanding practice of “addbacks”.

The practice of add-backs involved notionally including money or assets that had already been spent and no longer existed back into the asset pool as though they still existed.

Shinohara involved a relationship of six years with a relatively modest asset pool of approximately $600,000 plus superannuation. The parties to the matter had agreed to include notional add-backs into the asset pool. These were funds that had previously been spent from the partial property distribution to the husband and from the sale proceeds of a property that had been sold.

At trial the Court excluded the notional addbacks from the property pool without notice to the parties prompting the wife to appeal due to procedural unfairness.

The Full Court in Shinohara interpreted s79 of the Act and held that under s79(3)(a)(i) only property that was in existence at the time of the hearing can be included in the asset pool.

The Full Court emphasised that spent funds continue to remain relevant but should be considered as contributions under s79(4) of the Act and in assessing the current and future circumstances of the parties, under s79(5) of the Act.

Even if “add-backs” are not included in the balance sheet, they are not ignored. The Court will consider expenditure of funds through the lens of who contributed more and who needs more given what has been spent and what remains available for division. It is now more important for parties to keep specific and detailed records of their expenditure during the separation process.

From your very first conference with us you will know where you stand, what your options are and what to expect.

That is why your first 30-minute consultation with us is FREE.

Let us be your voice in troubled times.

Blog

Empower Family Law & Mediation acknowledge Victorian Aboriginal people as the traditional owners of the land on which we live, work and play. We pay our respects to their Elders, past, present and emerging; and we recognise the ongoing living culture of all Aboriginal people. We express commitment to Aboriginal self-determination and our hope for reconciliation and justice

Empower Family Law & Mediation support LGBTI and Trans communities. We are committed to the elimination of discrimination against LGBTI and Trans communities and we subscribe to the UN Standards of Conduct for Business to Tackle LGBTI Discrimination. We adopt a zero-tolerance approach to discrimination.

Level 7,
555 Lonsdale Street,
Melbourne, VIC 3000

e: info@empowerfamilylaw.com.au
t: +61 3 7020 6542

© 2025 Empower Family Law & Mediation. Limited Liability by a scheme approved under the Professional Standards Legislation. | Privacy Policy
Back To Top